Skip to content

Resolve dependency vulnerabilities #61

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
trevornelson merged 1 commit into from
Jan 20, 2026
Merged

Resolve dependency vulnerabilities #61

trevornelson merged 1 commit into from
Jan 20, 2026

Conversation

@trevornelson
Copy link
Contributor

@trevornelson trevornelson commented Jan 15, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Resolves vulnerable versions of uri and rexml.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 15, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

Version constant bumped from 1.0.0 to 1.0.1 in the module definition with corresponding test assertion updated to match the new version string.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Version Bump and Test Update
lib/unit-ruby/version.rb, spec/version_spec.rb		 Updated VERSION constant from '1.0.0' to '1.0.1'; test assertion updated to verify the new version string

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 2
❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ⚠️ Warning The title 'Resolve dependency vulnerabilities' is vague and does not accurately reflect the actual changes, which only involve a minor version bump (1.0.0 to 1.0.1) in version files and test updates. Update the title to more accurately describe the actual changes, such as 'Bump version to 1.0.1' or 'Update version and test expectations to 1.0.1'.
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description mentions resolving vulnerable versions of 'uri' and 'rexml' and modernizing bundler and ruby, but the actual changeset only shows version number updates in Ruby files with no dependency or configuration file modifications. Clarify the description to match the actual changes, which appear to be a version bump, or provide the missing dependency configuration file changes that resolve vulnerabilities.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 879db6f and e846889.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Gemfile.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • lib/unit-ruby/version.rb
  • spec/version_spec.rb
🔇 Additional comments (2)
lib/unit-ruby/version.rb (1)

1-3: LGTM!

The patch version bump from 1.0.0 to 1.0.1 is appropriate for a release that addresses dependency vulnerabilities without introducing breaking changes or new features.

spec/version_spec.rb (1)

3-7: LGTM!

Test assertion correctly updated to match the new version constant.

✏️ Tip: You can disable this entire section by setting review_details to false in your review settings.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@trevornelson trevornelson force-pushed the trevor/address-package-vulnerabilities branch from 879db6f to e846889 Compare January 15, 2026 16:38
@trevornelson trevornelson merged commit 59502cd into main Jan 20, 2026
3 checks passed
@trevornelson trevornelson deleted the trevor/address-package-vulnerabilities branch January 20, 2026 19:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@Eitansbd Eitansbd Eitansbd approved these changes

@ianyamey ianyamey Awaiting requested review from ianyamey

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@trevornelson @Eitansbd